What The Hobby Lobby Decision Means For Your Health Care
By Tara Culp-Ressler and Igor Volsky June 30, 2014
On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that closely held corporations can refuse to offer contraceptive coverage to their workers on religious grounds, siding with two businesses who say they’re morally opposed to certain types of birth control. The highly anticipated case has been dominating the national headlines for months. But now that the decision is here, how does it affect you?
If you’re one of the estimated 14,000 individuals who work at Hobby Lobby or Conestoga Wood — the companies who represented the two plaintiffs in the case — then you’re most immediately affected by Monday’s decision. Your employers no longer have to cover several types of birth control that they’re opposed to.
Both companies object to covering emergency contraception, which they falsely claim is a type of abortion despite all scientific evidence to the contrary. Hobby Lobby’s owners also take issue with two forms of intrauterine devices (IUDs), long lasting forms of birth control inserted in the uterus, for the same unscientific reason. So the workers employed by those businesses won’t be able to use their insurance coverage for those types of birth control anymore. They’ll presumably be able to continue using their health plans for other methods, like hormonal birth control pills, that their bosses don’t have a problem with.
But even if you don’t work at Hobby Lobby or Conestoga Wood, there’s a chance that your birth control coverage may be put into question. More than 70 other companies also sued for the right to stop following Obamacare’s contraceptive provision. According to the National Women’s Law Center, 48 of those cases are still pending. Now that the Court has sided with Hobby Lobby, it will be much easier for some of those companies to win their suits and opt out of covering certain types of contraception.
- Scarabus on Guilty until proven innocent
- black_dog_barking on Guilty until proven innocent
- black_dog_barking on Alert!
- Kate Cumiskey on 50th Anniversary tribute to a woman whose meaning to me could never be represented by a single word or phrase!
- Jewel Dickson on 50th Anniversary tribute to a woman whose meaning to me could never be represented by a single word or phrase!
- Body Image
- Civil Rights
- Corporate Psychopathy
- Earned Benefits
- Economic Equality
- Equality of Education
- Global Warming
- Just Because
- Local Business
- Love and Sex
- New Category
- Paranoia & Xenophobia
- Social Justice
- Voting Rights
- Women's Issues