Scarabus

Crawling toward the sunlight

Archive for the ‘Hypocrisy’ Category

Freedom *of* religion vs. freedom *from* religion.

Saturday, June 15th, 2013

 

Voila Capture1377

 

Texas Gov. Rick Perry: Americans have no right to freedom from religion
By Eric W. Dolan
Thursday, June 13, 2013 17:15 EDT

 

“I think it was Thomas Jefferson who said the price of liberty is eternal vigilance,” Nichols remarked. “One of those freedoms is the freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and as the governor was saying the Constitution refers to the freedom of religion, not the freedom from religion.”

“So, challenges to these freedoms that we enjoy can come in a lot of different ways,” the state senator continued. “They can come in very large ways like the war on terror or our freedoms can be taken away in small ways like the removal of a Christmas tree from a classroom.”

 

FreedomComp 1

 

Babbo 1

What was he thinking … or was he?

Friday, June 14th, 2013

 

Part of an Anthony Weiner Fundraising Letter

 

Voila Capture1729 copy

 

Part of My Response to that Letter

 

WeinerComp 1

U.S. version of Stassi? Even in their happiest wet dreams the Stassi couldn’t have imagined this!

Tuesday, June 11th, 2013

Update: Yeah. I misspelled “Stasi.” I recognized it as soon as I saw it on my blog.  But I left it. I’m a fuck-up, and so is everyone else. Including everyone at every level of government. And every official part of our security establishment. And every “private contractor” like Snowden and his employers — the cyber-equivalents of “Blackwater.”

You trust these fuck-ups? including me? Then it’s game over. Democracy is done.

 

Referring to Snowden’s revelations about the NSA’s spying on Americans, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews just said, “Apparently a majority of Americans are OK with this program.” I hope “Tweety” is wrong (as he is most of the time). Here’s why:

Were these same Americans OK with the “inform on your neighbors” practices Nazis encouraged in occupied Europe? Remember Anne Frank? You like both the child’s idealistic diary and the craven domestic spying of the weasels who outed her to the Nazis … who, albeit indirectly, murdered both her and her family? Then look up the term “cognitive dissonance” on the web.

You like the NSA spying on Americans program? But you hate the spying on East Germans program of the notorious Stassi? Same advice: Look up the term “cognitive dissonance.”

 

Voila Capture1714

 

Why did J. Edgar Hoover remain in office for so long? Even though several successive presidents recognized his poisonous evil and personally hated him? Because Hoover’s F.B.I., on his personal orders, had for decades been collecting covert information with which to blackmail anyone who even hinted at deposing him.

You think the feds can be trusted to use data they collect only against those we all would consider enemies of or threats to our nation? You’re sane, sober, and drug-free? And you still believe that?

You a Democrat? Remember that what David Spitzer did was the same as what a whole lot of politicians do, regardless of party. But only Spitzer was targeted by an official federal investigation. Why Spitzer? Uh, you do remember that his nickname was “Sheriff of Wall Street,” right? And that he was investigated and threatened with prosecution by the Alberto Gonzales “Cheney/Shrub” Justice Department, right? You a Republican? Remember your hysteria about your conviction that the feds — IRS to be specific — were using information they had collected to target ultra-rightwing 401 (c ) tax dodgers?

You still trust the feds to collect information about every American citizen, indiscriminately, and then cherry-pick that information to target our nation’s enemies? And you trust that your definition of our nation’s enemies will be the same as that of whichever bureaucratic/elected/private contractor is doing the cherry-picking?

Then you’re beyond the reach of evidence and rational argument. Just return to your leftwing or centrist or rightwing pipe dream.

Bradley Manning

Sunday, June 9th, 2013

 

Yes, I think Bradley Manning should be given some time in prison for what he has confessed to doing. With credit for time served, and with addition credit for having been tortured for an extended time.

In the cells next to him should be those whose war crimes he blew the whistle on; those who ordered and/or permitted his torture; those leaders who lied us into war; those who have been profitting from no-bid, cost-plus contracts; those who have covered up; those who insist on making an example of him; etc.  It would have to be a very, very big prison indeed. And it would probably be run by a private prison-profiteer like CCA.

A single scapegoat might have serve to carry away the sins of an ancient village and die for the common good. But it’s going to take more than one highly idealistic young Army private to carry the sins of the military industrial banking oil governmental complex responsible for putting our nation in its present fix. And you can count the treatment being given to Bradley Manning as yet another of their sins.

 

Whistleblower 3

 

 

Parse the words carefully!

Saturday, June 8th, 2013

 

Voila Capture1546

 

Why The Tech Company ‘Denials’ Don’t Necessarily Mean They Weren’t Cooperating With NSA Spying

By Andrea Peterson on Jun 6, 2013 at 10:35 pm

 

Following reports of a top secret program called PRISM that allows intelligence agencies to access a wide variety of supposedly private online communications, several of the tech companies implicated in the report have issued carefully worded statements denying the government has access to their servers or a backdoor method of entry. But that doesn’t necessarily mean the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) don’t have the ability to access their data.

Comparing denials from tech companies, a clear pattern emerges: Apple denied ever hearing of the program and notes they “do not provide any government agency with direct access to our servers and any agency requesting customer data must get a court order;” Facebook claimed they “do not provide any government organisation with direct access to Facebook servers;” Google said it “does not have a ‘back door’ for the government to access private user data”; And Yahoo said they “do not provide the government with direct access to our servers, systems, or network.” Most also note that they only release user information as the law compels them to.

[Emphasis is mine.]

 

DirectComp 1

 

P.S. Ever notice the strange similarities between the Apple and Facebook logos? Pure coincidence, I’m sure.

save the dream!

Wednesday, June 5th, 2013

Welcome to Florida!

Tuesday, June 4th, 2013

 

Voila Capture1546

 

Citing Stand Your Ground, Jury Acquits Man Who Killed Wife’s Lover

By Nicole Flatow on Jun 4, 2013 at 9:00 am

 

Ralph Wald, a 70-year-old Vietnam veteran, walked into his home around midnight, and less than ten seconds later, fired three shots at Walter Conley, according to ABC News. He told the jury he thought Conley was raping his wife when he saw them having intercourse in his home. But during a 911 call, when the dispatcher asked Wald if the man was dead, Wald responded, “I hope so!” and refused to help the man. He asked for medical help for his wife, Johnna Flores, since he thought he accidentally shot her also. He said he didn’t recognize Conley even though he had been roommates with his wife prior to her relationship with Wald, lived next door to Wald, had tattoos of Flores on his neck and back, and worked for Flores at her fencing company.

Prosecutors argued that Wald, who suffered from erectile dysfunction, killed Conley in a jealous rage, pointing out that Wald used the word “fornicate” in reports to police, and never the word “rape.”

 

 

Welcome 3

 

Bam 1

The scandal is turning a nothing into a scandal

Monday, June 3rd, 2013

 

Voila Capture1379

 

William Boardman
NationofChange / Op-Ed
Published: Monday 3 June 2013

Can’t Anyone Here Play This Game Straight?

Almost everything you hear and read in the media about the current IRS “scandal” is based on deliberate falsification of basic facts. Some might call it lying.

Here’s a reasonably typical media-framing of the IRS lie, from the usually careful and accurate Economist, posted May 23: “Even before this month’s revelation that conservative political groups applying for 501(c)(4) status were being singled out for special scrutiny….”

You see this false framing of the IRS story across the media spectrum, from Info wars to ABC News and NBC News to the Economist to DemocracyNOW! (The latter on May 24: “the scandal over the targeted vetting of right-wing groups…). Even the usually reliable Wonkblog at the Washington Post doesn’t get the story right, apparently because it hasn’t read the relevant law.

An exception to this remarkable mental stampede in the wrong direction was Jeffrey Toobin (New Yorker, May 14) who wondered, “Did the I.R.S. actually do anything wrong?” His answer started to put the story in reasonable perspective, with a focus on tax law and political money: “…the scandal isn’t what’s illegal—it’s what’s legal. It’s what society chooses not to punish that tells us most about the prevailing ethical standards of the time.”
∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Only near the end of the story, in a clumsily written paragraph, does the AP reporter touch on the factual context for the news Lerner was breaking and in which she had been a central player:

“In all, about 300 groups were singled out for additional review, Lerner said. Of those, about a quarter were singled out because they had ‘tea party’ or ‘patriot’ somewhere in their applications.”

In other words, about 225 applications were not “political conservative groups, as AP had reported at the top of the story, and for which it has yet to issue a correction or an apology.

 

75 1

 

Do these yahoos ever laugh at their hypocrisy?

Friday, May 31st, 2013

 

 

 

What do these women all have in common, apart from the fact that they’re working mothers?

 

Voila Capture1654

They’re all either hosts or regular contributors to Fox News.

This guy is on the House *Intelligence* Committee!

Wednesday, May 29th, 2013

 

Voila Capture1643

 

 

GOP Rep: Gitmo Hunger Strikers Look Like They’ve Put On Weight

…A Senior Staff Attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights… discussed the humanitarian crisis at Gitmo as more than 100 of the detainees have participated in a hunger strike where guards are force-feeding prisoners through nasal cavities.

[Rep. Mike Pompeo (R KS)], who visited Guantanamo Bay last week, said that was not the case as he becomes visibly agitated after being confronted with facts.

“It is not a crisis mode,” he said Sunday. “We have prisoners down there that have chosen not to consume calories, have chosen not to take protein. We now have an obligation to try to take care of them. The last thing to say about these folks who are assertedly hunger strikers is that they look to me like a lot of them have put on weight.”

Great move by Craig Melvin [interviewer from MSNBC], as he immediately asks him how he could possibly know if the detainees had put on weight unless he saw them before they started their hunger strike. After which Pompeo tries to change the subject in order to save face.

 

Hunger 1