Scarabus

Crawling toward the sunlight

Archive for the ‘Media’ Category

Nixon: “If the president does it, then it’s legal.”

Saturday, June 15th, 2013

 

Often heard these days: “If the good guys do it, then it’s a good thing to do.” Besides…

 

Terra 1

 

NATIONAL SECURITY!

KEEP AMERICA SAFE!!

 

Extortion 1

Dedicated to every naif who whines, “I’m innocent, so I don’t mind being tracked by the NSA.

Friday, June 14th, 2013

 

Edward Current’s Al Qaeda Caller I.D.

Unless Edward asks me to desist, I’m going to keep reminding readers of this video. It was made during the Cheney/Shrub administration, when we first learned about federal domestic spying on American citizens. But it’s even more important now than it was then. Barack Obama has picked up exactly where Dick Cheney left off, and the domestic spying continues to grow geometrically.

∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

 

My wife likes to watch cop shows. I love my wife, and I’ll watch anything she chooses, just so I can be with her. But, honestly, I really deplore  a lot of what happens on those shows. Examples? The “good guys” routinely break the law. We’re supposed to think that’s OK because, after all, they’re the good guys, right? We can trust them, right?

In other words, we’re urged to support a government of persons rather than a government of laws. Bullshit!

If a person is “brought in for questioning,” without being arrested, that person often fails to insist that a lawyer be present for the interrogation. “Why do I need a lawyer? After all, I’m totally innocent!”

You might or might not be innocent, pal. Regardless, if you think being innocent matters, you’re a fool. Time after time we see news stories about police … misfeasance’s? … malfeasance’s? … having led to conviction of an innocent person. Sometimes DNA evidence proves innocent the “secondary” victim (the person whose death or injury led to the trial being the primary victim), sometimes it’s …

∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

 

My wife just came home. Gotta go snuggle her.

 

∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

U.S. version of Stassi? Even in their happiest wet dreams the Stassi couldn’t have imagined this!

Tuesday, June 11th, 2013

Update: Yeah. I misspelled “Stasi.” I recognized it as soon as I saw it on my blog.  But I left it. I’m a fuck-up, and so is everyone else. Including everyone at every level of government. And every official part of our security establishment. And every “private contractor” like Snowden and his employers — the cyber-equivalents of “Blackwater.”

You trust these fuck-ups? including me? Then it’s game over. Democracy is done.

 

Referring to Snowden’s revelations about the NSA’s spying on Americans, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews just said, “Apparently a majority of Americans are OK with this program.” I hope “Tweety” is wrong (as he is most of the time). Here’s why:

Were these same Americans OK with the “inform on your neighbors” practices Nazis encouraged in occupied Europe? Remember Anne Frank? You like both the child’s idealistic diary and the craven domestic spying of the weasels who outed her to the Nazis … who, albeit indirectly, murdered both her and her family? Then look up the term “cognitive dissonance” on the web.

You like the NSA spying on Americans program? But you hate the spying on East Germans program of the notorious Stassi? Same advice: Look up the term “cognitive dissonance.”

 

Voila Capture1714

 

Why did J. Edgar Hoover remain in office for so long? Even though several successive presidents recognized his poisonous evil and personally hated him? Because Hoover’s F.B.I., on his personal orders, had for decades been collecting covert information with which to blackmail anyone who even hinted at deposing him.

You think the feds can be trusted to use data they collect only against those we all would consider enemies of or threats to our nation? You’re sane, sober, and drug-free? And you still believe that?

You a Democrat? Remember that what David Spitzer did was the same as what a whole lot of politicians do, regardless of party. But only Spitzer was targeted by an official federal investigation. Why Spitzer? Uh, you do remember that his nickname was “Sheriff of Wall Street,” right? And that he was investigated and threatened with prosecution by the Alberto Gonzales “Cheney/Shrub” Justice Department, right? You a Republican? Remember your hysteria about your conviction that the feds — IRS to be specific — were using information they had collected to target ultra-rightwing 401 (c ) tax dodgers?

You still trust the feds to collect information about every American citizen, indiscriminately, and then cherry-pick that information to target our nation’s enemies? And you trust that your definition of our nation’s enemies will be the same as that of whichever bureaucratic/elected/private contractor is doing the cherry-picking?

Then you’re beyond the reach of evidence and rational argument. Just return to your leftwing or centrist or rightwing pipe dream.

Bradley Manning

Sunday, June 9th, 2013

 

Yes, I think Bradley Manning should be given some time in prison for what he has confessed to doing. With credit for time served, and with addition credit for having been tortured for an extended time.

In the cells next to him should be those whose war crimes he blew the whistle on; those who ordered and/or permitted his torture; those leaders who lied us into war; those who have been profitting from no-bid, cost-plus contracts; those who have covered up; those who insist on making an example of him; etc.  It would have to be a very, very big prison indeed. And it would probably be run by a private prison-profiteer like CCA.

A single scapegoat might have serve to carry away the sins of an ancient village and die for the common good. But it’s going to take more than one highly idealistic young Army private to carry the sins of the military industrial banking oil governmental complex responsible for putting our nation in its present fix. And you can count the treatment being given to Bradley Manning as yet another of their sins.

 

Whistleblower 3

 

 

The bars don’t lie!

Thursday, June 6th, 2013

 

Coverage of Issues

 

Rape irs 1

 

 

Answer

The scandal is turning a nothing into a scandal

Monday, June 3rd, 2013

 

Voila Capture1379

 

William Boardman
NationofChange / Op-Ed
Published: Monday 3 June 2013

Can’t Anyone Here Play This Game Straight?

Almost everything you hear and read in the media about the current IRS “scandal” is based on deliberate falsification of basic facts. Some might call it lying.

Here’s a reasonably typical media-framing of the IRS lie, from the usually careful and accurate Economist, posted May 23: “Even before this month’s revelation that conservative political groups applying for 501(c)(4) status were being singled out for special scrutiny….”

You see this false framing of the IRS story across the media spectrum, from Info wars to ABC News and NBC News to the Economist to DemocracyNOW! (The latter on May 24: “the scandal over the targeted vetting of right-wing groups…). Even the usually reliable Wonkblog at the Washington Post doesn’t get the story right, apparently because it hasn’t read the relevant law.

An exception to this remarkable mental stampede in the wrong direction was Jeffrey Toobin (New Yorker, May 14) who wondered, “Did the I.R.S. actually do anything wrong?” His answer started to put the story in reasonable perspective, with a focus on tax law and political money: “…the scandal isn’t what’s illegal—it’s what’s legal. It’s what society chooses not to punish that tells us most about the prevailing ethical standards of the time.”
∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Only near the end of the story, in a clumsily written paragraph, does the AP reporter touch on the factual context for the news Lerner was breaking and in which she had been a central player:

“In all, about 300 groups were singled out for additional review, Lerner said. Of those, about a quarter were singled out because they had ‘tea party’ or ‘patriot’ somewhere in their applications.”

In other words, about 225 applications were not “political conservative groups, as AP had reported at the top of the story, and for which it has yet to issue a correction or an apology.

 

75 1

 

Do these yahoos ever laugh at their hypocrisy?

Friday, May 31st, 2013

 

 

 

What do these women all have in common, apart from the fact that they’re working mothers?

 

Voila Capture1654

They’re all either hosts or regular contributors to Fox News.

Rand Paul: “The LameStream Media Lurve Me! An ordinary looney is boring. But if he attacks the Democrats? Oh, yeah! He’s a star!!

Monday, May 20th, 2013

 

Budd 1

Ever wonder what it would be like to …?

Friday, May 17th, 2013

 

HippoComp 1

Michele (one-”l”) hears from her constituents

Thursday, May 16th, 2013

 

Michele Bachmann: Every Weekend People Tell Me They Want Obama Impeached)

The Huffington Post | By Paige Lavender

Posted: 05/16/2013 10:47 am EDT | Updated: 05/16/2013 1:28 pm EDT

 

‘Michele, what in the world are you all waiting for in Congress? Why aren’t you impeaching the president? He’s been making unconstitutional actions since he came into office,’” Bachmann said.

 

Impeach 1